Scores are other people's

REKA reviews and comparisons

Choose a dated review or a focused comparison. REKA coverage mixes early access and 1.0 launch articles, so an aggregate score alone cannot tell you which build was assessed.

Walking chicken-leg hut at dusk, generated scene art

OpenCritic reported 78/100, 67% recommended and six entries on 2026-10-27 (one aggregator source). Its early-access release label does not establish the dates of the linked reviews.

Cubed3's 7/10 review and Analog Stick Gaming's article are both dated 26 October 2026. Indie Games Devel's 6.5/10 review is dated 6 November 2024 and explicitly covers early access. Our full roundup separates these rather than labelling all critics as 2024 coverage.

At 08:30 UTC on 2026-10-27, Steam displayed 1,976 English reviews at 83% positive and 147 recent reviews at 87% positive. These are single-platform snapshots, include early-access reviews, and change during the day. Neither pool is a 1.0-only verdict.

For purchase context, Cubed3 and Gamer Social Club both praise building/folklore while describing rough edges; these are attributed observations, not our testing. Use the review roundup for detailed source caveats, or compare alternatives by the feature you want. Mirthwood is a different game; its search popularity is not a quality verdict.

This hub supplies no original review score. Similar-game and folklore links are editorial navigation, not proof that those games share every REKA mechanic.

Explore REKA reviews and comparisons

Twilight forest path, generated scene art

Questions

What is REKA's OpenCritic score?

A 2026-10-27 snapshot showed 78/100, 67% recommended, six reviews. It is a single-aggregator, mixed-era figure.

Are there reviews from the 1.0 launch?

Yes. Cubed3 and Analog Stick Gaming both published 26 October 2026 articles. Other linked reviews explicitly cover 2024 early access; check each date.

Related REKA pages

Sources checked . Public-source summaries, not a claim of first-hand gameplay testing.